No fucking warning = megabitching

topic posted Fri, December 14, 2007 - 7:48 PM by  Lunatic
Back in 1996 or something the Bay Area SantaCon went down to the south bay. I don't recall this level of bitching about it, and I think one of the main reasons was because it was ANNOUNCED WELL IN ADVANCE.

This year someone had to play super-secret squirrel and announce that the details weren't going to be available until noon on the day before. Combine that with a major location change and it's no wonder there's so much bitching.

For those in the east bay, the expectation, well in advance, is that SantaCon is going to be in SF, so east bay people know how to prepare. For instance, people likely to join SantaCon are also likely to be already familiar with getting around SF via foot/bus/cab/etc.

If I'd known, a couple weeks ago, that SantaCon was going to be in Oakland, this year, I'd have no problem with it. I just found out now, though, and that's a jolt.

Yeah, the people who made the announcements probably keep the details close to the chest this way specifically to avoid a revolt to a competing SF-only SantaCon or a boycott, but isn't that what's happened anyway?

BTW, are there any easy-to-get-to on foot from Jack London Square titty bars in Oakland? The Santa invasion of the Hustler club last year was a highlight. Plus Santas joining the wedding. And Santas successfully making it all the way up to the Cheesecake Factory at the top of Macy's and back down again. And the same thing at Nordstrom's (the year before we were thrown out before making it to the top). And of course Santas in Hooters, and the red tide moving down Lombard Street!

Shit. Sweet times. Does Oaktown have anything to compare to all this? WTF can Santa do over there to spread his "special" brand of holiday cheer to all the holiday tourists and shoppers like at Fisherman's Wharf, Union Square, and the Westfield shopping center?

Someone please enlighten me, really. Help me feel like I'll get as much a kick out of SantaCon in Oakland as I get out of doing it in SF.
posted by:
Lunatic
SF Bay Area
  • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

    Fri, December 14, 2007 - 8:12 PM
    You mean by holding back information Santa created some santarchy? oh well. Advance planning is nice for my vacation and retirement accounts, not my spontaneous trips into ridiculous land.

    WHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
    • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

      Fri, December 14, 2007 - 10:04 PM
      there is actually a good reason to not announce the location or route weeks in advance. most of you are lucky that you've never been to a santacon where you were greeted by a phalanx of riot-suited cops after the location and date was posted in advance in wired news, and where you had to help bail your good friend out of jail after being arrested on a trumped-up felony charge of possession of a club for carrying a small torch used for fire breathing. (you can read my write-up of this santacon here: santarchy.com/santas-day-in-san-jose/ )

      it really astonishes me how whiny so many SF people are being about the location. nice to see that SF snobbery is alive and well. i do love attending events in SF, but oakland is not timbuktu - it's a 20 minute bart ride from downtown SF, there's lots of cool stuff on this side of the bay, and we even have indoor plumbing here.
      • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

        Fri, December 14, 2007 - 11:24 PM
        I'm tired of hearing how not releasing the stops keeps the police at bay. Do we really think that police can't get to ANY of our stops within minutes? And once they know we've started, they have these things called radios and they can tell other police where we are headed.

        I went to Portland's con last weekend with 800 Santi. I knew the stops, but not the route, weeks before I left. I knew where the stops were to eat. I knew when Santa left so if I had to leave for various reasons, I knew when to meet up and where they went next. I knew to expect the gay bar. I saw fewer cops than in my neighborhood in SSF.

        I'm OK with out trip to OAK. I'd prefer to keep to SF, but I go where Santa takes me.

        But fer cryin out loud, riot police can be dispatched to Santa within 10 minutes, and with our numbers we'll still be there when they arrive.

        So drop the secret rout keeps police at bay shit!

        Thank you.
  • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

    Sat, December 15, 2007 - 2:09 AM
    Thanks for all the "helpful" responses reassuring me that Oaktown's going to be as much of a fun time as SF for Santa...

    As far as the response about holding back info creating some santarchy: SOME number of super-sekrit people decided that there was a need to give some organization to this, and decided to make a decision on the behalf of HUNDREDS of other Santas that the bay area SantaCon was going to Oakland/the east bay, this year, WITHOUT ANY ADVANCE WARNING. That's not santarchy, and that's not "spontaneous trips into ridiculous land," or any other land that's not spelled OAKland.

    All it would have taken is a couple week's notice that "Hey, the bay area's SantaCon is going to the East Bay, this year!" Then the bitching could have been done and gotten over a couple weeks ago, and a rival "Keep Santa in SF!" splinter group could have formed, reducing the SF mob down to a smaller number (which is what this is really all about; see this year's canceled Urban Iditarod--oh yeah, see this year's Halloween in the Castro for the city putting an official kibosh on a big event, too).

    ALSO, east bay people who had trouble with making it to SantaCon in SF could have had a better chance to go, in a slightly smaller group that's trying to avoid so big a presence as to bring out the riot police.

    I'm certainly not saying that the full route needed to be published. Just a little more goddamn notice, hey?

    Is this really it for SF wacky fun in 2007? No Urban Iditarod, no Halloween in the Castro (nevermind that it's been all gangbangers, lately), and no SantaCon??? Just the relatively tame St. Stupid's Day, and the oranized-to-hell Bay to Breakers, Pride Parade, Folsom Street Fair, and the yawn of the other street fairs?

    Has the gentrification and the NIMBYs finally won in San Francisco, of all places?
    • No fucking warning = total ducking fabulosity

      Sat, December 15, 2007 - 2:18 AM
      By all means lets do the same old shit as so called spontaneious happenings get press and SF Weekly profiles:

      "Bring the kids. And some red store bought clownsuit to throw over your Dockers. Get a clichëd story in place to relate to your so-called peers at the water cooler on Monday. Remember , Smile Like It Was All So Krazy and Fantastik - or - play it cool so you can revel in the delayed glory of fellow inmates whispering 'bout your wacky rep around the cubicle farm."

      Some folks decided to shake it up.
      Last minute chaos is fantastic.
      Time for Santi Nation to wake the fuck up
      and go Mobile,
      Agile,
      and Fertile

      I have no idea what is gonna happen tomorrow.
      And it is totally fabulous.

      Chaos? preemptive revolt by lamerz?
      tears? Santology lessons for Chinatown and Little Saigon?
      Maybe we invade Rockridge, shut the muthah down and drain McNally's , The Hut and all bars in between of all possible fluids?

      Enuf of all this sturm und drang. Time to get my rest for the coming funStorm!!
      • No, some folks did NOT decide to "shake things up." SOME folks decided to PLAN, in ADVANCE, for hundreds of other people, without telling them anything about it until the last minute!

        Anyone who thinks this year's SantaCon happening in the east bay is at all spontaneous, or in any way actually intended to be chaotic, is seriously deluded.

        You're living in a fantasy if you don't think there's a planned route.

        Someone's trying to be organized, and doesn't want to be responsible if real shit goes down--not that I blame them.
        • Yeah sure there is a route. Sure somebody or two or three had an idea and sprung it at the last minute.

          It's the resultant upheaval of this change that opens up some fun space: we got about 3 mentioned SF revolts conceptually floating around, an evening at Ocean Beach with bonfires proposed to compete with the barcrawl., a fair amount of relocated folks tootling over to a town they don't know really from Adam, a cohort of Oaklanders thrilled to intoduce Oakland and Santi to each other and have a bitchin' time.
          It's up to us to make what we will of it.


          No one in charge!! ohhhhhh noooooooooo!!

          Everyone is responsible for themself. Life is like that.

          Besides what "REAL SHIT" could GO DOWN??
          Who is gonna short circuit my frontal lobe and make me incapable of handling myself like I always have?
          Are we all gonna be blindfolded, herded to a brisk gallop and led onto a freeway off ramp?
          You think it will be a replay of the Stop The Draft March of 1967 with the Hell's Angels and the ghost of Ed Meese commanding the Blue Meanies to crack Santa skulls?

          Lighten the fuck up.
        • "SOME folks decided to PLAN, in ADVANCE"

          Exactly. A VERY few people (I not one of them) decided to take on the not trivial task of putting this together, while it sounds like a lot of people sat back to let someone else deliver their santacon fantasy order to their doorstep.

          It takes planning. Someone did it. Offers went out for participation. Did you sign up?
          • The original point of that line was countering the claims that SantaCon is all "spontaneous" and unplanned, when it's not.


            I would have volunteered to help out, if I had known of a way to do so (i.e. advance notice). I can't see any calls for volunteers in any of these locations:

            sanfranciscosantarchy.wordpress.com/
            santarchy.com/
            www.santacon.com/
            santacon.tribe.net/

            'Course, public notice then gets into that perpetual cycle of "We can't make a public call for help, because then the cops could infiltrate us, but we could use more people to help, but we can't make a public call for help..."

            I did get lucky and found out the night before how I could help build robot costumes and join in the Robot Rumble in Berkeley. I've posted here that I'll volunteer help to plan and organize for the future. The level of secrecy surrounding this, though, makes it hard to help out.
    • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

      Sat, December 15, 2007 - 9:20 AM
      lunatic, if you're so upset about the lack of "wacky fun" in san francisco, why don't you think up and organize an event, instead of complaining? it's not all that hard, but it does require work - and it's pretty impressive how ungrateful you guys are toward the organizers of this event, who have been planning the route and other stuff for at least two months.

      easy to complain, a bit harder to help create fun for people.

      btw, i organize an event where we try to set the date and location democratically, and it's a pain in the ass even among a group of 40-50 people. i'd like to see you try to set up an email list for all however many hundred people participate in santacon and try to democratically come to a consensus on the route. it's impossible, and eventually one person or a very small group has to make a decision.

      also so sorry that our responses haven't been "helpful" in reassuring you that this event will be fun. your complaining, on the other hand, has been soooo helpful.
      • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

        Sat, December 15, 2007 - 11:36 AM
        Uh huh. And the result all this planning is a whole bunch of complaining countered by a whole bunch of COUNTER-complaining by people who have some inside info, hurt and upset by how ungrateful everyone is. As if it's such a surprise that there's so much of an uproar.

        Impressed by how ungrateful people are? I'm impressed by how surprised people are at the complaints.

        Then there's the "suck it up, it's spontaneous!" comments, when it's anything but.

        So many people on high horses, let's play polo!

        I'm just glad I called someone and got some inside info of my own, so I know a spot to meet up later in the day, instead of trying to meet at 10am to catch a ferry. Maybe now that I'm one of the "kool kids" with an "in" I can switch sides over to the "shut up! stop complaining you ungrateful wretches!" camp.

        Nah, still not surprised at the complaints. Which is the original point of this whole thread.
      • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

        Sun, December 16, 2007 - 1:36 PM
        Pyrokitten suggests instead of complaining that we organize our own event. You know what Pyro, had we known what was going to go down yesterday, we COULD have!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        But Santa has to be so fucking secret, we had no choice. So now we bitch. And now we see...will another group come up and plan a better event for next year; or do we get to complain again?

        I've offered up my willingness to help plan an event next year. If I do so, my conditions are to plan a pub crawl with posted stops and durations of each stop. If you want an anarchist event, plan that one. If you want a secret event no one will no about until less than 24 hours in advance, plan that one.

        There is no reason this bay area can't handle more than one Santa event a season!
        • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

          Sun, December 16, 2007 - 4:17 PM
          i completely agree that there is no reason why the bay area can't handle two santacons. we were hoping people would splinter. i sent a large group of folks to the irish bank. people got impatient and missed out on many of the fun activities that were in store. not sure of anyone attended the robot rumble in the park.

          i'm not a bit sorry that any of this happened. the bitching and moaning is to be expected. i had fun. i enjoyed being a part of this and we learned a few things about this year that's for sure.

          seeing everyone get off that boat and those oakland santas waiting for them was priceless. seeing weazie lead you people off that boat gave me goosebumps. kimball's was the best fucking bar to go to and berkeley was hella fun.

          i'm sad to see that this is just nothing but a bar crawl tho. not really very cacophanous in my opinion.

          we never posted any information about last year's route just so you all know and you still had fun.

          only thing i'm bummed about is text mob not working.
          • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

            Sun, December 16, 2007 - 4:54 PM
            "we were hoping people would splinter."
            "people got impatient and missed out on many of the fun activities that were in store."

            So why were so many surprised that there was so much complaining?

            People were complaining because they were worried that the red tide would splinter and/or people wouldn't be able to find it, and they, or their friends, would miss out on "many of the fun activities that were in store." And it happened.

            And ho boy was txtmob so not up to the task.

            I did my best to help out. I was sending txtmobs from Berkeley onwards (loading the website on my phone's browser, which was painful, but sending actual texts wasn't working for me). I could only send to the SFSantaConRevolt txtmob, though, because I didn't have access to send to the santarchy one. I was updating my Twitter feed, which helped some Santas join up. I also posted some updates here on Tribe, which may have at least gotten some Santas to join in at the tail end at Zeitgeist. I would have updated prior to Berkeley, but I got details the night before about the Robot Rumble, so I drove over, helped build robot costumes, and joined in as a robot myself.

            As I posted in another thread here, I'll volunteer to help out in the future, via txtmob/Twitter/Pownce/website updates/whatever, as long as I can get the info needed to make it happen. I'll help planning/scouting locations, and whatever else necessary, too.

            And y'know, if people were hoping the red tide was going to splinter, it would have been easy to accomplish that. Just tell everyone in advance that there's going to be separate contingents, with multiple starting points. The complaints then, if any, would have been reduced to mostly "But which one do I join??"
            • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

              Sun, December 16, 2007 - 5:25 PM
              text mob worked great last year. no one would ever suspect that it would have the problems it had this year. i never received one single text.

              as far as meeting up with your friends, a simple phone call or text asking where they are doesn't work? i managed to get all calls and texts from folks who wanted to meet up later and they had no problem finding us.

              and when you get somewhere around 600 plus people together the only thing you can do is splinter. that's what happened in portland and it didn't bother me in the slightest. you just can't keep that many people together.

              and i never said i didn't expect bitching. i fully expected it.
              • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

                Sun, December 16, 2007 - 5:39 PM
                Well, I thought the whole thing fucking sucked.

                I had friends from the East Bay drive to the city (they are not on Tribe and had no idea of what was going on). They paid to park. They then paid to ride the ferry, thinking we'd be back some time during the day. Then they had to come all the way back to get their car when all they wanted to do was leave for home from Berkeley.

                I had friends who got 2 hotel rooms in the city; not cheap hotel rooms, either. They did so thinking it would be an easy stumble back when the red tide was going out. They had to come all the way back to the city to go to bed when they could have easily gotten a much cheaper room in Oakland or Berkeley.

                I hope if there is one thing our wonderful organizers learn from all of this is that they should have (and certainly could have) let us know in advance that we would not be in the city.

                OK, want to keep it a fucking secret? Do so: "Hello Santa's in Santa Land. Santarchy is in a few weeks and we are here to let you know this year's route will not be in the city of SF. Plan accordingly. You may want consider that Santa will spread cheer somewhere in Oakland and Berkeley. HO!"

                Hell, had I known in advance I could have made my plans so much better. And instead of bitching, I could have joined those who are talking about planning their own next year!

                Now I know (since this was my first) to not trust Santarchy, but those who are posting what is going on in advance. Fuck the secrecy!
              • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

                Sun, December 16, 2007 - 10:09 PM
                I signed up for TxtMob last year and joined the santarchy group then, too, and there were problems then, as well. In fact I recall other Santas this year remarking about how TxtMob got overloaded, last year. Maybe it worked better for people who signed up earlier.

                Regardless, relying on a single means of getting info around like (aka single point of failure) that is asking for trouble. For instance, if Twitter had been chosen as the single means there could have been trouble as Twitter announced that they were going to have a service outage that exactly coincided with the bay area SantaCon (10am-10pm PST). In the end they shifted that outage to Sunday, but they didn't actually update the outage notice until well after SantaCon had started.

                Again, I'll volunteer to send the updates. In fact, I'll volunteer to send updates to multiple services (which I was already doing to help out, on my own initiative, this year), not just TxtMob.

                Now, it's simple to say to call or text your friends, but you can't argue there can be so many complications with that (not having a phone, changed numbers, not hearing it ring, lost/broken phones, service dead zones, etc, etc). Of course, that's one of the reasons for using TxtMob, as a "broadcast to many" update service, but we saw the problems there.

                I'm not aruging against splintering. Just that if it's hoped/planned from the start, that it's ANNOUNCED from the start. Otherwise, it's like planning to ruin some people's day, by leaving them out of the "in crowd" who were lucky enough to know about or keep up with the special events that have been planned. Fortunately, Santas on both sides of the bay did manage to have a good time. It could easily have gone much worse for the Santas still in SF, though, such as bars and malls calling the cops, or not enough motion, or whatever.

                BTW, I wasn't singling specific people out for being surprised at the complaining, just remarking about it in general.
          • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

            Mon, December 17, 2007 - 11:34 AM
            this was my first CA santacon, as ive mentioned. it was great fun! pier 39 was a good kick off, i loved hearing some guy say 'what is this, a santa convention?" i told him he was exactly right, and i would have given him a prize had i not been running from the bathroom to catch the ferry. i havent taken the ferry to jack london square before, we sang on the top deck. i have a few santa friends who live close by who were waiting for us on the other side. yay!

            i had read about the bitching here at one point, about oakland vs SF. when it came time to split, i chose the o-town side, even though this is my first SF santacon... but i wanted to be with the real santas, not the whiny bitches! so off to berkeley we went!

            i loved chatting up so many santas over random things, repeating myself constantly and laughing my ass off. and i only had to wait in a long bathroom line, once. that was amazing! but, what was up with the stretcher at jupiter? anyone know? heard some nasty rumors about that one.

            went back to SF around dark, and was a little jealous to hear the santas had been around union sq and macys and whatnot. while i loved talking to the santas, in hindsight i had spent a lot of time standing outside of places talking to other santas, and not much time interacting with the public. this makes me feel like i missed out, just a little. i love freakin' the normals! :)

            as for no warning, i dont see that as being much of a problem, really. if you plan to go all day, what does it matter where you are so long as youre with santa?! a few years ago in NYC there was a lot of bitching over santacon planning, a few burners were planning that year, and a few cacophony peoples were very worried that it would become a bar crawl. there was much discussion of this, which i think helped set a standard of non-bar stops: grand central station, santa dodegball in central park, riding the subway, visiting the rockefeller center tree, brooklyn bridge, etc. its still a bar crawl to some extent, it just takes awhile to get to one :)

            it was lovely meeting you all, santas! see you next year if not before!
  • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

    Sun, December 16, 2007 - 6:14 PM
    As one of the planners for this years event in lovely Vancouver, BC, we didn't really give any specifics other than these until Friday @ 12noon:

    1) Meet at The Waldorf @ 12n
    and
    2) Dinner at Moose's Down Under @ 5:30pm - $12 for the buffet (and this location was changed this Tuesday)

    Other than that, we planners had a list of the places we would have *liked* to have gone to but by 4pm, with the sun going down and the alcohol levels going up, we totally threw our "list" in the trash bins since we didn't make any of our planned stops. We made THREE unplanned bar stops on Commercial Drive as well as blocking traffic & having a paddling of the Santa Butts in an intersection. Then, after getting on SkyTrain, we went to a bar just outside of Chinatown (The Ivanhoe) instead of going to Tobi's before dinner. WOOT!!! Then there were several stops at more bars, coats were lost, phones misplaced, money shoved down the Ms. Clauses cleavages and THEN we got back on route down Robson Street, blocking traffic and making people in cars mad when they got a *nice* sticker. But "Robson Street" was all that was planned - no specific stops at all. Just harass the tourists still shopping at 8pm on a Saturday night....

    Be more resourceful, Santa. We broke a bus in 2005. We still get on the bus. They know we are coming. They are on our yahoo group email list. We had plans to get on the SeaBus to go to the North Shore for dinner but with the hockey game on, they could not very easily accommodate 85+ Santa's so we changed dinner plans this past Tuesday. We hit The Odyssey (a male strip club with TWO poles!!) unannounced and got all of us in for no cover charge.

    Plans change. So should Santa.
    • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

      Sun, December 16, 2007 - 11:03 PM
      Aside from the planned dinner break, that's how SF SantaCons usually run, too.

      In the bay area, crossing the bay between SF and Oakland introduces significant logistical challenges, though, and there were many complaints, especially since the details were released so late. In the end the complaints turned out to be not unfounded, as evidenced by the number of Santas left behind when they couldn't all fit on the ferry.
      • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

        Mon, December 17, 2007 - 5:15 PM
        "Aside from the planned dinner break, that's how SF SantaCons usually run, too. "

        Ahem. How the fuck do you know this? have you ever planned a SantaCon before? I was one of the planners last year and I can tell you it doesn't "just happen". I can also say that from your attitude on this and other threads you would be one of the last people I would want on the planning committee.

        2 cents from a former Bay Area Santa
        -r
  • Re: No fucking warning = megabitching

    Sun, December 16, 2007 - 7:52 PM
    Yeah, so if I knew in advance we were all going to Oakland, I probably would've wussed out and stayed home. But, the ferry ride was priceless, and the two trips on Bart were great. It was a totally new experience, and I'm all the better for it. If you have ever been to Burning Man, and you ever hopped on an art car, it's the same experience. If you haven't you should. It's good for the soul to surrender yourself to a new experience, and just fucking let go. Too much order and planning makes Santa a very, very dull boy.
    That said, let's stay in SF next year; and just going bar to bar is very lame. The most fun I had was that spontaneous sidewalk dance party in Union Square.
    • no whining

      Mon, December 17, 2007 - 4:09 AM
      santa, please
      • and idea

        Mon, December 17, 2007 - 8:36 AM
        i have an idea that might make things less problematic for next year

        2 santa groups

        santarchy and santa the bar crawl

        santarchy would be full of surprises, some drinking and for those who want to be involved in a cacophonous event.

        santa the bar crawl. get your drink on in your red suit with no surprises. know the route, etc.

        people can decide what they want to do and